I was asked this question in an interview. Though I tried my best to answer the question in whatever way I could (I was explaining in terms of mathematics), the professor looked upset.

Any idea?

The professor was not interested in mathematics/equation/properties.

**Contents**hide

#### Best Answer

**Matrix Inverse in Terms of Geometry:** If a matrix works on a set of vectors by rotating and scaling the vectors, then the matrix's inverse will undo the rotations and scalings and return the original vectors.

If the first linear transformation is not unique, there are several ways to do the transformation and you cannot determine that path you need to take to reverse the transformation. In terms of geometry that means that the vectors you're scaling/rotating are in some sense so alike that you can reproduce a specific result by combining the vectors in more than one way. I believe in terms of statistics we'd refer to that as multicollinearity. If the transformation is not unique then you have a singular matrix, and you need to apply specific rules governing how you interpret the transformation in order to generate the inverse.

### Similar Posts:

- Solved – the physical significance of inverse of a matrix?
- Solved – the physical significance of inverse of a matrix?
- Solved – Generalized inverse solution to system of linear equations proof
- Solved – Should I apply log transformation to column with long-tail distribution before clustering?
- Solved – Why is SVM sensitive to scaling of features?