I'm running a multiple linear regression. Let's suppose I really need to use the logarithmic transformation. However, all values of one variable are negative. I assume I have to do the following: X1 + constant. After that, I can use the logarithmic transformation and run a multiple regression.

I'd like to mention that I have done that before **without the logarithmic transformation**, running a simple linear regression and it has affected only an alpha coefficient (makes perfect sense for me).

For example, I have got the following results:

- y = 1,08 + 0,56*x1, original x1
- y = -0,03 + 0,56*(x1 + 2), x1 + constant

So I can use both equations for making predictions, getting the same results.

Is it still possible to interpret Beta coefficients? I am used to relying on elasticity and logarithmic transformation, showing how independent variables influence "Y". Do I need to take into account that I have added a "constant"? If I do, how?

**Contents**hide

#### Best Answer

I would not do this. The problem is that what you choose to add to make x positive is arbitrary and can have a huge effect on the parameter estimates.

First, let's set up x and y and the model:

`set.seed(1234) #Sets a seed x <- rnorm(100, -10, 1) #Normal mean = -10, sd = 1 y <- 3*x + rnorm(100) `

Now, we'll adjust x to be positive so that logs can be taken. Usually, people choose to make the smallest adjusted x close to 0, but how close? Let's try two variations:

`xadj1 <- x-min(x) + 0.01 xadj2 <- x-min(x) + 0.1 `

Now, we fit models:

`m1 <- lm(y~log(xadj1)) summary(m1) #-32.52 + 3.29*log(xadj1) m2 <- lm(y~log(xadj2)) summary(m2) #-33.90 + 4.88*log(xadj2) `

And the results are quite different.

### Similar Posts:

- Solved – BoxCox transformation suggest natural logarithm transformation. Can log10 transformation be used instead?
- Solved – fitting a logarithmic model
- Solved – Known alpha and type I error rate simulation
- Solved – Converting standard deviation for data on a logarithmic scale base 10 to stdev with base e
- Solved – SciPy’s stats boxcox transformation unexpected behavior: negative exponent (lambda)