I'm having a problem running a repeated-measures ANOVA in R using the ezANOVA function.
I have data from 20 subjects – each subject participated in 2 conditions and 2 laps (80 total data points in a balanced design with no missing cells).
When I try to run the full RM ANOVA
model<-ezANOVA(data=RMdata ,dv=sd_speed ,wid=P ,within=c("Pr","lap") ,type=3)
I get the following error over and over again:
Error in ezANOVA_main(data = data, dv = dv, wid = wid, within = within, : "dv" must be numeric.
But the dv (sd_speed) is numeric!
Classes ‘grouped_df’, ‘tbl_df’, ‘tbl’ and 'data.frame': 80 obs. of 4 variables: $ P : Factor w/ 20 levels "1","2","3","4",..: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... $ Pr : Factor w/ 2 levels "control","VPA": 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... $ sd_speed: num 4.06 4.55 3.82 10.96 3.28 ... $ lap : Factor w/ 2 levels "1","2": 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... - attr(*, "vars")=List of 1 ..$ : symbol P - attr(*, "drop")= logi TRUE
I've read and tried everything and I really don't know how to fix it. It would be a pleasure if someone could help me!
Contents
hide
Best Answer
This seems to be a bug associated with the 'tbl_df'
format of your data frame. You can turn your data into a standard R data frame by using the function data.frame()
. For example, right within the call to ezANOVA:
model<-ezANOVA(data=data.frame(RMdata) ,dv=sd_speed ,wid=P ,within=c("Pr","lap") ,type=3)
Similar Posts:
- Solved – How to calculate chi squared from mauchly of R’s ezANOVA output
- Solved – why does the same repeated measures anova using ezANOVA() vs. aov() yield different distributions of model residuals
- Solved – why does the same repeated measures anova using ezANOVA() vs. aov() yield different distributions of model residuals
- Solved – aov() versus ezANOVA F-values
- Solved – Difference between aov() and ezANOVA when using a subset of DataFrame in repeated measures ANOVA